-
Intervention
Do non-nutritive sweeteners (saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame-K, sucralose, neotame) affect food intake in adults?
-
Conclusion
Non-nutritive sweeteners do not increase food intake. Modest energy savings can result if non-nutritive sweeteners replace sugar-sweetened products in a form that is also lower energy.
-
Grade: II
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
Do non-nutritive sweeteners (saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame-K, sucralose, neotame) affect food intake in children?-
Conclusion
Non-nutritive sweeteners do not increase food intake. Short-term studies suggest that modest energy savings can result if non-nutritive sweeteners replace sugar-sweetened products in a form that is also lower energy. Long-term studies need to assess if use of non-nutritive sweeteners in children help to balance energy intakes with energy expenditures.
-
Grade: II
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Conclusion