HTN: Sub-group Analysis of MNT Interventions (2022-24)

HTN: Sub-group Analysis of MNT Interventions (2022-24)

Medical Nutrition Therapy Interventions: Sub-Group Analysis 

The following table is a visual representation of the results of a subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effect of medical nutrition therapy delivered by a registered dietitian nutritionist or international equivalent on adults with pre-hypertension or hypertension according to intervention characteristics mean difference (95% CI)a. Further synthesis can be found in the systematic review evidence summaries. 

 
Variable SBP (mmHG)
(n=21 studies)
DBP (mmHG)
(n=22 studies)
BW (KG)
(n=14 studies)
BMI (kg/m2)
(n=7 studies)
 Dietitian only or Multidisciplinary Team  vs. Controls
 Dietitian only  -4.73 (-5.66, -3.80)
 n=8 studies
 -2.49 (-3.16, -1.82)
 n=9 studies
-2.09 (-3.98, -0.20)
n=2 studies
-1.45 (-2.79, -0.10)
n=3 studies
 Multidisciplinary  -2.04 (-2.73, -1.36)
 n=13 studies
-1.25 (-2.59, -1.50)
n=13 studies
-1.73 (-2.67, -0.79)
n=12 studies
-0.22 (-0.41, -0.03)
n=4 studies
 Individual or Blended (individual and group) Intervention Settings  vs. Controls
 Individual -4.53 (-6.54, -2.53)
n=13 studies
-2.29 (-3.45, -1.13)
n=13 studies
-0.79 (-1.50, -0.07)
n=6 studies
-0.09 (-0.35, 0.17)
n=5 studies
 Group -5.50 (-18.52, 7.52)
n=1 study
-3.50 (-9.82, 2.82)
n=1 study
-0.90 (-15.20, 13.40)
n=1 study
n=0 studies
 Blended -3.27 (-4.10, -2.44)
n=7 studies
-1.91 (-2.55, -1.26)
n=8 studies
-2.41 (-3.62, -1.19)
n=7 studies
-0.67 (-1.76, 0.41)
n=2 studies
 Anti-hypertensive Medication Use vs. Controls
 Majority using 
 anti-HTN
-3.16 (-4.12, -2.21)
n=12 studies
-1.62 (-2.30, -0.93)
n=14 studiesb
-1.26 (-2.01, -0.51)
n=11 studies
-0.22 (-0.47, 0.02)
n=4 studies
 No anti-HTN use -5.16 (-6.98, -3.34)
n=9 studies
-2.71 (-3.75, -1.66)
n=9 studiesb
-2.31 (-3.84, -0.79)
n=3 studies
-1.18 (-2.79, 0.42)
n=3 studies
 Duration of Intervention vs. Controls
 <6 months -4.66 (-5.86, -3.46)
n=11 studies
-3.51 (-4.53, -2.48)
n=12 studies
-0.65 (-1.29, -0.01)
n=5 studies
-1.20 (-2.78, 0.37)
n=3 studies
 6-12 months -4.58 (-9.30, 0.14)
n=6 studies
-1.48 (-2.21, -0.75)
n=7 studies
-1.88 (-3.20, -0.56)
n=6 studies
-0.08 (-0.34, 0.18)
n=3 studies
 >12 months

-2.81 (-3.67, -1.96)
n=4 studies

-1.28 (-2.21, -0.35)
n=3 studies

-2.49 (-4.02, -0.96)
n=3 studies
-0.40 (-0.67, -0.13)
n=1 study
 Publication Date vs. Controls
 Published before 
 2000
-3.04 (-3.82, -2.26)
n=8 studies
-1.75 (-2.35, -1.15)
n=9 studies
-2.25 (-3.44, -1.05)
n=8 studies
-0.40 (-0.68, -0.13)
n=2 studies
 Published2000 
 onward
-5.48 (-8.10, -2.87)
n=13 studies
-2.73 (-4.19, -1.27)
n=13 studies
-0.86 (-1.61, -0.10)
n=6 studies
-0.10 (-0.36, 0.16)
n=5 studies
 Overweight/Obesity Required for Inclusion (Yes vs. No)
 Overweight/Obesity
 Required
-4.17 (-7.30, -1.05)
n=7 studies
-2.42 (-3.49, -1.34)
n=8 studies
-2.00 (-3.31, -0.69)
n=6 studies
-0.10 (-0.43, 0.23)
n=2 studies
 Not required -3.45 (-4.24, -2.67)
n=14 studies
-1.76 (-2.43, -1.09)
n=14 studies
-1.67 (-2.87, -0.47)
n=8 studies
-0.42 (-0.69, -0.15)
n-5 studies
 Anti-HTN=anti-hypertensive medication; BMI=body mass index; BW=body weight; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; SBP = systolic blood pressure

a All results are compared with control groups. For the study characteristic of “ROB classification”, too few studies were classified as “High risk” or “Low risk” to be stratified in subgroup analyses; thus, ROB classification was not included in subgroup analyses.
b Samples sizes do not add up to n=22 studies, as one publication included analysis of anti-HTN use vs. no anti-HTN use for BW and is represented in the sample size for each category.