CKD: Fish Oil Therapy (2008)

Citation:
 
Study Design:
Class:
- Click here for explanation of classification scheme.
Quality Rating:
Research Purpose:

To summarize the major findings in studies on the effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on kidney transplantation.

Inclusion Criteria:
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without any restriction in sample size and language
  • Reported any outcome in adults or children who underwent kidney transplantation and received omega-3 fatty acids
  • Acceptable sources of omega-3 fatty acids included fish oil (EPA and DHA), vegetable oils that contain alpha linolenic acid (ALA), Mediterranean diet or other sources in which the quantity was reported explicitly
  • Major outcomes included the post-transplantation GFR, BP, lipid profile, patient and graft survival, episodes of rejection and dose and through levels of CsA.
Exclusion Criteria:

Non-human subject or articles without primary sources of data, articles focused on subjects who did not undergo kidney transplantation, did not use omega-3 fatty acids or when the amount could not be quantified.

Description of Study Protocol:

Search Strategy

  • Databases searched: Medline and Medline In Process (1966 to December 2003), Embase (1980 to 2003), Biologic Abstracts and Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau databases (1973 to December 2003), BIOSIS abstracts and Central Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Update Software, issue 4, 2003). Bibiliographies of retrieved citations were also reviewed for additional studies.
  • Experts and authors of major controlled trials were contacted to identify other sources of data, including unpublished studies
  • Search terms: Referred to AHRQ report.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meta-Analysis Methods

  • For continuous outcomes such as BP, GFR, and lipid levels, net changes, the difference between the change in the omega-3 fatty acid arm and the control arms were calculated
  • For dichotomous or categorical variables, the rates in the treatment and control groups were expressed as a relative risk (RR) and 95% CI
  • Random-effects model was used for meta-analyses.
Data Collection Summary:
  • Direct measurement of the GFR with a radioisotope or inulin were used for comparison across studies whenever available
  • The following study features were extracted from full text articles: Study design, blinding, randomization method, quantity and type of omega-3 fatty acids, eligibility criteria, control interventions, sample characteristics, reasons for withdrawals and all reported outcomes.
Description of Actual Data Sample:
  • Total number of studies identified from the search: 1,281
  • Total number of full-text articles reviewed: 78
  • Total number of studies meeting the inclusion criteria: 16
  • Number of studies excluded and reasons: 49 were rejected because they did not fulfill inclusion criteria, and eight studies were excluded as duplicate reports of the same patient, three RCTs of heart transplant, one RCT of liver transplant; one RCT of bone marrow transplant
  • Total number of patients in the meta-analysis: 830
  • Location: United States.
Summary of Results:

Quality of Eligible Studies

  • Studies generally were small, and many had important methodologic limitations. Summary results were potentially underpowered.
  • Masking and methods of randomization were generally not well described
  • Many trials did not use isocaloric treatments or fats with comparable fatty-acid profiles in the control group, potentially biasing comparisons, especially for cardiovascular outcomes
  • There was variability in the degree to which compliance was assessed, and there was variability in the rigor with which end points were defined and measured.

Patient Characteristics

 
Author, Year
Country
Total N Duration
 Graft Donor 
Immuno-suppressive Rx
Urakaze, 1989
Japan

30

6

CADAVER:15
LIVING:15
CsA
Aza
Prednisolone
Homan van der Heide, 1990a
Netherlands
31
1
ND
CsA
Prednisolone
Homan van der Heide, 1990b
Netherlands
24
3
ND
CsA
Prednisolone
 
Berthoux, 1992
France
32
12
CADAVER
CsA
Homan van der Heide, 1992
Netherlands
88
1
CADAVER
CsA
Prednisolone
Homan van der Heide, 1993
Netherlands
66
12
CADAVER
 
CsA
Prednisolone
Schut, 1993
Netherlands
58
8
Tx: 4
CADAVER
 
 
CsA
Aza
Prednisolone
Yoa, 1994
France
23
6
ND
CsA
Aza
Corticosteroids
Bennett, 1995
USA
90
6.5
CADAVER
or LIVING
CsA
Aza
Prednisone
Maachi, 1995
France
80
12
CADAVER
CsA
Aza
Prednisolone
Kooijmans-Coutinho, 1996
Netherlands
50
12
Tx: 3
CADAVER
CsA
Prednisolone
Castro, 1997
Portugal
43
3
ND
CsA
Prednisolone
Rodriguez, 1997
Spain
34
6
CADAVER
CsA
Prednisolone
Busnach, 1998
Italy
42
12
CADAVER
or LIVING
CsA
Aza
Santos, 2000
Portugal
30
12
CADAVER
CsA
Prednisolone
Hernandez, 2002
Spain
91
12
CADAVER
CsA
Aza
Prednisone

Aza: azathioprine; CsA: cyclosporine

Graft-related Outcomes

  • Seven deaths out of a total of 830 kidney transplant patients, all of which were reported in three trials (Kooijmans-Coutinho et al, 1996; Homan van der Heide et al, 1993; Busnahch et al, 1998)
  • Graft Survival: Fish oil supplementation began three days post-transplantation in eight of the 10 RCTs with a total of 228 and 234 subjects in the fish oil and control groups, respectively. The pooled RR of graft survival in those who received fish oil supplementation was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.05). There was no statistical heterogeneity among studies. In two studies, fish oil was begun at 16 weeks and more than one year post-transplantation. No benefit from fish oil treatment was observed in either study.

Renal function

No consistent benefit was observed. The magnitude of benefit suggested in RCTs with positive findings was modest and did not translate into improved graft survival with up to one year of follow-up. The data do not support a clear relationship between the time in which the supplement began and the treatment effect.

Author, Year
GFR or CrCl method
Treatment Started (Post-transplant)
N
Fish oil
EPA+DHA
(g per day)
N
Placebo or Control
Results
Baseline
(ml per minute per
1.73m2)
Net Δ
P
Hernandez, 2002
EDTA
Day 2
45
1.9
40
Soy oil
50.8
+2.8
n.d.
Santos, 2000
EDTA
Day 2
15
3.0
15
Placebo
ND
+4.1 b
n.d.
Homan van der Heide, 1992
CrCl
Day 3
39
3.0
47
Coconut oil
ND
+4.0 c
n.d.
Homan van der Heide, 1993
125I
Day 3
30
3.0
28
Coconut oil
42.0
+3.0
n.d.
Kooijmans-Coutinho, 1996
125I
Day 3
14
3.0
17
Coconut oil
46.1
-1.0
n.d.
Homan van der Heide, 1990a
125I
Day 3
14
3.0
17
Coconut oil
ND
-4.0 d
n.d.
Berthoux, 1992
Inulin
Day 3
14
2.7
15
No placebo
44.6
+0.2
 n.d.
Maachi, 1995
Inulin
Day 3
40
2.5
40
No placebo
47.5
+2.1
 n.d.
Bennett, 1995
DTPA
16 wks
22
5.4
50
Corn oil
68.0
-19.0
n.d.
18
2.7
73.0
-19.0
n.d.
Homan van der Heide, 1990b
125I
9 mo
11
3.0
10
Corn oil
56.0
+16.5
<0.01
Schut ,1993; Schut ,1993 ; Schut ,1992; Levi, 1992
125I
1 yr
5
Fish oil: 3.0
+ CsA
5
Corn oil + CsA
57.0
-10.0
n.d.
5
Fish oil: 3.0
+CsA & Pred
5
Corn oil + CsA + Pred
50.0
+3.0
n.d.
5
Fish oil: 3.0
+Aza & Pred
4
Corn oil + Aza + Pred
62.0
+5.0
n.d.

ND = no data; n.d. = not done; DTPA = 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate; 125I = 125I-iothalamate; EDTA = [51Cr] EDTA; Inulin = Inulin clearance; wks = weeks; mo = months; yrs = years. 
bOnly the difference after intervention between the two groups could be calculated due to lack of baseline data.
cOnly the difference after intervention between the two groups could be calculated due to lack of baseline data. Median values were used because mean values were not reported.
d No baseline data were available; the three-month measures served as baseline values.

 

CVD-related Outcomes

 A modest, consistent benefit was found only for TG levels among kidney transplant recipients. Specifically, eight RCTs (with a total of 200 and 199 patients in the fish oil and control groups, respectively) included TG as an outcome. Although there were exception, in aggregate, the data support a benefit of fish oil in lowering serum TG concentrations.

Author Conclusion:

No consistent benefits were evident with omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on any outcome evaluated in kidney transplantation, with the exception of a modest reduction in TG levels. The benefit on TG is consistent with the effects of omega-3 fatty acids in the non-transplant settings.

Funding Source:
Reviewer Comments:

Up to 2005, there was no new RCT examining fish oil treatment for kidney transplent patients. This review and Lim et al, 2007 systematic review included the same set of studies, except for Corda et al, 1992, which is only included in Lim et al, 2007 systematic review.

Quality Criteria Checklist: Review Articles
Relevance Questions
  1. Will the answer if true, have a direct bearing on the health of patients? Yes
  2. Is the outcome or topic something that patients/clients/population groups would care about? Yes
  3. Is the problem addressed in the review one that is relevant to dietetics practice? Yes
  4. Will the information, if true, require a change in practice? Yes
 
Validity Questions
  1. Was the question for the review clearly focused and appropriate? Yes
  2. Was the search strategy used to locate relevant studies comprehensive? Were the databases searched and the search termsused described? Yes
  3. Were explicit methods used to select studies to include in the review? Were inclusion/exclusion criteria specified andappropriate? Wereselectionmethods unbiased? Yes
  4. Was there an appraisal of the quality and validity of studies included in the review? Were appraisal methodsspecified,appropriate, andreproducible? Yes
  5. Were specific treatments/interventions/exposures described? Were treatments similar enough to be combined? Yes
  6. Was the outcome of interest clearly indicated? Were other potential harms and benefits considered? Yes
  7. Were processes for data abstraction, synthesis, and analysis described? Were they applied consistently acrossstudies and groups? Was thereappropriate use of qualitative and/or quantitative synthesis? Was variation in findings among studies analyzed? Were heterogeneity issued considered? If data from studies were aggregated for meta-analysis, was the procedure described? Yes
  8. Are the results clearly presented in narrative and/or quantitative terms? If summary statistics are used, are levels ofsignificance and/or confidence intervals included? Yes
  9. Are conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? Are limitations ofthe review identified anddiscussed? Yes
  10. Was bias due to the review's funding or sponsorship unlikely? Yes