This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary Cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.

Analytical Cookies

In order to best serve its website customers, ADA maintains data indicating which website pages are of interest to its customers. Information is maintained in aggregate and not by individual customers. If you do not wish to allow ADA to track your visit in aggregate, please select the 'I do not accept' option below. Click the Save Settings button to set your preference.

I accept the usage of analytical cookies
I do not accept the use of analytical cookies

Please note that this pop-up notice will appear on every CDR website page until you have saved your preferred setting.

Fluoride (FL) Systematic Review (2010)

Fluoride (FL) Systematic Review (2010): Grade Chart

You can view a dynamic graph showing the percentage of grades in each category (Grade I, II, III, IV, V) for this project. To see which evidence analysis conclusion statements received a particular grade, simply click on that part of the dynamic graph.

Grades are assigned to indicate the overall strength or weakness of evidence informing the conclusion statement.

Loading Chart...
  • Grade I means there is Good evidence supporting the statement;
  • Grade II is Fair;
  • Grade III is Limited;
  • Grade IV is Expert Opinion;
  • Grade V is Not Assignable.
For a more detailed explanation of the meaning of the grades, click here.

[Note: If the pie-shaped graph does not appear on your screen, you may need to download Macromedia Flash. Click here for information about this free download.]