Quick Links

Recommendations Summary

Pediatric Weight Management (PWM) Using Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diets for Pediatric Weight Loss

Click here to see the explanation of recommendation ratings (Strong, Fair, Weak, Consensus, Insufficient Evidence) and labels (Imperative or Conditional). To see more detail on the evidence from which the following recommendations were drawn, use the hyperlinks in the Supporting Evidence Section below.


  • Recommendation(s)

    PWM: Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diets: Short-term Treatment

    If children and adolescents are >120% of ideal body weight, have serious medical complications and would benefit from rapid weight loss, then a Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diet (PSMF) could be utilized in a short-term intervention (typically 10 weeks) under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers who specialize in pediatric obesity. Research shows that short term use of a PSMF brings about short term and longer term improvement in weight status and body composition when part of a medically supervised, multicomponent program.

    Rating: Weak
    Conditional

    PWM: Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diets: Long-term Treatment

    The Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diet is not recommended for long-term weight management for obesity in children or adolescents. There are few well designed studies to support the use of this intervention for longer than 10 weeks.

    Rating: Weak
    Imperative

    • Risks/Harms of Implementing This Recommendation

      • Electrolyte imbalance, especially hypokalemia, can be a side effect of the PSMF,
      • Electrolytes should be monitored and potassium should be supplemented through dietary supplements when this diet is implemented,
      • A daily multivitamin supplements containing 100% of the DRI should be prescribed with the diet to ensure adequate vitamin and mineral intake especially since fruit, vegetable and dairy consumption may be limited,
      • Adequate fluid intake should be encouraged to prevent dehydration.

    • Conditions of Application

      Parents/caregivers of obese children and adolescents need to participate in the counseling process.

      The Protein Sparing Modified Fast Diet should not be used in obese pregnant adolescents. Prior to implementing PSMF, screen for pregnancy and provide anticipatory guidance to avoid pregnancy while on this diet.

      PSMF stage of intervention should be followed by a less restrictive diet intervention.

    • Potential Costs Associated with Application

      Additional medical and laboratory monitoring may incur increased healthcare costs.

    • Recommendation Narrative

      The purpose of using a PSMF diet is to bring about rapid weight loss in obese children during the initial phase of treatment (10-20 weeks) while minimizing the negative effects of a very low calorie diet. Even though studies utilizing the PSMF diet showed significant short term weight loss (Figueroa-Colon, von Almen, et al 1993 Brown R, Sothern M et al 2000, Brown R, Sothern M et al 2000, Sothern and Hunter 1999, Sothern, M., Loftin, M. et al 2000, Sothern, M., Loftin, M. et al 2000) it is unclear if the weight loss can be solely attributed to the macronutrient content of the diet or a result of a hypocaloric intake. Only one study, Figueroa-Colon, von Almen, et al 1993, compared the PSMF to a hypocaloric balanced macronutrient diet. However, the PSMF intervention arm still consumed a mean of 200 kcal/day less than the hypocaloric balanced nutrient control group.

      Long-term treatment outcomes (>=1 year) for  PSMF studies show that subjects initially treated were able to maintain some weight loss at one year. However, the data is limited to 4 studies with neutral ratings and a majority of the data was from the same treatment program. The one study (Figueroa-Colon, von Almen, et al 1993) that compared the PSMF diet with a hypocaloric balanced macronutrient diet showed some weight regain at one year compared to their post-treatment weight but, the children remained below their pre-treatment weight. Only 2 studies provided data on short term growth velocity but long-term effects on growth have not been studied. Data of hunger and satiety implications of the PSMF is very limited.

    • Recommendation Strength Rationale

      Conclusion Statements are Grade III and V

      • One received a positive rating, three received a neutral rating, and one received a negative rating,
      • All studies present results from the same treatment program (thus, no variation across settings),
      • Only one of the studies compared the use of a protein sparing modified fast diet with a control diet (balanced macronutrient diet)--and this study had subjects on the PSMF diet on a lower energy intake than the control group,
      • Four of the studies report outcomes at one year (or greater) post treatment,
      • Only two studies report on growth velocity,
      • Only one study provided information on self reported hunger "side effects" of PSMF versus balanced macronutrient diet.

    • Minority Opinions

      None.