-
Assessment
What is the evidence to support the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit or economic savings of inpatient MNT services provided by an RD?
-
Conclusion
Five studies were reviewed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit, and/or economic savings of inpatient Medical Nutrition Therapy services provided by a Registered Dietitian, involving individualized nutrition assessment and a duration and frequency of care using the Nutrition Care Process. Three studies report that nutrition screening, early assessment and treatment by a Registered Dietitian, leading to early discharge results in cost savings due to reduced length of hospital stay. Two studies demonstrate that appropriate parenteral nutrition use, based on recommendations from a Nutrition Support Team including a Registered Dietitian, results in cost savings. Further research is needed on the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit and/or economic savings of inpatient Medical Nutrition Therapy.
-
Grade: II
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
What is the evidence to support the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit or economic savings of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention?-
Conclusion
Compared with pharmacotherapy or no intervention, lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention were cost-effective in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life years gained, based on six cost-effectiveness analyses.
-
Grade: I
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
What is the evidence to support the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit or economic savings of outpatient MNT services provided by an RD?-
Conclusion
Ten studies were reviewed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit and economic savings of outpatient Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT), involving in-depth individualized nutrition assessment and a duration and frequency of care using the Nutrition Care Process to manage disease. Using a variety of cost-effectiveness analyses, the studies affirm that MNT resulted in improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs related to physician time, medication use and/or hospital admissions for people with obesity, diabetes and disorders of lipid metabolism, as well as other chronic diseases. Further research is needed on the cost-effectiveness, cost benefit and economic savings of outpatient MNT in other disease states.
-
Grade: I
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Conclusion