PDM: Prediabetes (2013)
-
Intervention
In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein, independent of weight loss, on glycemic-related outcomes (such as fasting blood glucose, random blood glucose, two-hour post-prandial blood glucose, A1C)?
-
Conclusion
There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on glycemic-related outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.
Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on glycemic outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.
-
Grade: V
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Search Plan and Results: PDM: Protein Type and Prediabetes 2012
In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein, independent of weight loss, on lipid outcomes (TG, HDL)?-
Conclusion
There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on lipid outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.
Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on lipid outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.
-
Grade: V
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Search Plan and Results: PDM: Protein Type and Prediabetes 2012
In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein, independent of weight loss, on anthropometric outcomes (WC, WHR)?-
Conclusion
There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on anthropometric outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.
Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on anthropometric outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.
-
Grade: V
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Search Plan and Results: PDM: Protein Type and Prediabetes 2012
In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein, independent of weight loss, on blood pressure?-
Conclusion
There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on blood pressure in individuals with prediabetes.
Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of vegetable-based protein vs. animal-based protein on blood pressure in individuals with prediabetes.
-
Grade: V
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Search Plan and Results: PDM: Protein Type and Prediabetes 2012
-
Conclusion