The EAL is seeking RDNs and NDTRs who work with patients, clients, or the public to treat children and adolescents living with type 1 diabetes, for participation in a usability test and focus group. Interested participants should email a professional resume to dhandu@eatright.org by July 15, 2024.

  • Project Resources

    The following resources were developed from this project:

    • Academy Position Paper: Use of Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweeteners
      Abstract:  It is the position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics that consumers can safely enjoy a range of nutritive sweeteners and nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) when consumed within an eating plan that is guided by current federal nutrition recommendations, such as the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and the Dietary Reference Intakes, as well as individual health goals and personal preference. A preference for sweet taste is innate and sweeteners can increase the pleasure of eating. Nutritive sweeteners contain carbohydrate and provide energy. They occur naturally in foods or may be added in food processing or by consumers before consumption. Higher intake of added sugars is associated with higher energy intake and lower diet quality, which can increase the risk for obesity, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. On average, adults in the United States consume 14.6% of energy from added sugars. Polyols (also referred to as sugar alcohols) add sweetness with less energy and may reduce risk for dental caries. Foods containing polyols and/or no added sugars can, within food labeling guidelines, be labeled as sugar-free. NNS are those that sweeten with minimal or no carbohydrate or energy. They are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration as food additives or generally recognized as safe. The Food and Drug Administration approval process includes determination of probable intake, cumulative effect from all uses, and toxicology studies in animals. Seven NNS are approved for use in the United States: acesulfame K, aspartame, luo han guo fruit extract, neotame, saccharin, stevia, and sucralose. They have different functional properties that may affect perceived taste or use in different food applications. All NNS approved for use in the United States are determined to be safe.  J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:739-758  (PDF)  
       
    • The Truth about Artificial Sweeteners or Sugar Substitutes - Recognizing our desire for sweet flavors, the food industry developed and supplied sugar free alternatives. Do these really help with weight loss or managing blood sugar levels in conditions such as diabetes? Or do they actually increase appetite and weight? This brochure, designed for the general public, takes a look at the different types of sugar substitutes and their potential effectiveness in helping manage weight and other medical conditions.  Click to order.
  • Project Team

    The following individuals contributed their valuable time and expertise to this project:

    Workgroup Members

    • Marion Franz, MS, RD, CDE, Chair
    • Kristine Clark, PhD, RD, FACSM
    • Molly Gee, MEd, RD, LD
    • Janelle Marshall Walter, PhD, RD, CFCS
    • Hope Warshaw, MMSc, RD, CDE
    • Eva Almiron-Roig, PhD, RD (resigned)
    • Katherine Beals, Phd, RD (resigned)
    • Christina Campbell, PhD, RD (resigned)

    Project Manager

    • Tami A. Piemonte, MS, RD

    Lead Analyst

    • Kyle Thompson, MS, RD, CD, CNSD

    Analysts

    • ?Elizabeth Droke, PhD, RD
    • Lenore Hodges, PhD, RD
    • Stacy Briscoe, MS, RD
    • Josh Brown, MS, RD
    • Mary Cluskey, PhD, RD
    • Abigail Larson, PhD, MS, RD

    Association Positions Committee Workgroup

    • Alana Cline, PhD, RD
    • Dian Sowa, MBA, RD
    • Connie B. Diekman, MEd, RD, LD, FADA

    Academy Staff

    • Deborah Cummins, PhD, RD
    • Anna Murphy, MPH, RD
    • Esther Myers, PhD, RD

    Financial Contributors

    • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

     


    Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest: In the interest of full disclosure, the Academy has adopted the policy of revealing relationships workgroup members have with companies that sell products or services that are relevant to this topic. Workgroup members are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest by completing the Academy Conflict of Interest Form. It should not be assumed that these financial interests will have an adverse impact on the content, but they are noted here to fully inform readers.

     

    • None of the workgroup members listed above disclosed potential conflicts.