Diabetes and Physical Activity
To update and crystallize current thinking on the role of exercise in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
None specifically mentioned.
None specifically mentioned.
Recruitment
Selection methods for articles not mentioned.
Design
Consensus Report.
Blinding Used (if applicable):
Not applicable.
Intervention (if applicable):
Not applicable.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of articles not described.
Timing of Measurements
Consensus Report.
Dependent Variables
Consensus Report.
Independent Variables
Consensus Report.
Control Variables
Initial N: Based on 6 references, including 1 technical review.
Attrition (Final N): 6 references
Age: Not mentioned
Ethnicity: Not mentioned
Other Relevant Demographics
Anthropometrics
Location:
Other Findings
Evaluation of the Patient Before Exercise
1. Patients with diabetes should undergo a detailed medical evaluation with appropriate diagnostic studies to screen for macro- and microvascular complications that may be worsened by the exercise program, and to allow for individualization of the exercise program.
2. Cardiovascular system:
A graded exercise test may be helpful if the patient is planning a moderate to high-intensity exercise program and is at increased risk for underlying CVD based on one of the following criteria:
- > 35 yrs of age
- type 2 diabetes >10 yr
- type 1 diabetes >15 yr
- any additional risk factor for CAD
- microvascular disease: proliferative retinopathy or nephropathy, including microalbuminuria
- peripheral vascular disease
- autonomic neuropathy
3. Peripheral arterial disease
Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is based on signs & symptoms:
Intermittent claudication, cold feet, decreased or absent pulses, atrophy of subcutaneous tissues, and hair loss.
4. Retinopathy
Eye exams are recommended yearly in those with diabetes. Joslin Clinic recommendations for physical activity in those with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or nonproliverative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) can be used for recommendations:
Moderate NPDR: Discourage activities that dramatically increase
-
Power lifting
-
Heavy Valsalva maneuvers
Repeat ocular exam q 4 - 6 months
Severe NPDR: Repeat ocular exam q 2 – 4 months PDR: Discourage strenuous activities Activities that are acceptable Repeat ocular exam q 1-2 months 5. Nephropathy Specific recommendations for patients have not been developed for decreased renal function (microabluminura >20 mg/min or overt nephropathy <200 mg/min). However, most with renal disease do not have the capacity for exercise that limits physical activity. 6. Neuropathy: peripheral (PN) PN with loss of sensation of the feet can increase the risk for injury. Contraindicated exercise: Recommended exercise: 7. Neuropathy: autonomic Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) may be indicated by resting tachycardia >100 beats/minute, orthostasis (a decrease in systolic blood pressure >20 mmHg upon standing). Sudden death and silent MI may be the result of CAN in diabetes. Resting or stress thallium myocardial scintigraphy is an appropriate noninvasive test for macrovascular CAD in these individuals. Exercise and type 2 diabetes 1. Glycemic control: Regular exercise training increases insulin sensitivity and improves HbA1c by 10% - 20% in those with mild type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2. Prevention of CVD Low levels of aerobic fitness are associated with many CVD risk factors especially in individuals with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance syndrome. 3. Hyperlipidemia Regular exercise is effective in decreasing TG rich VLDL. 4. Hypertension The effects of exercise on reducing blood pressure have been demonstrated most consistently in hyperinsulinemic subjects. 5. Obesity Exercise may enhance weight loss and weight maintenance when used along with a reduced kcal diet. 6. Prevention of type 2 diabetes Exercise is useful in preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exercise and type 1 diabetes mellitus 1. Those with type 1 diabetes can participate in physical activity if they are in good glycemic control and do not have complications. 2. Exercise can improve the lipoprotein profile, decrease blood pressure, and improve cardiovascular fitness. Few studies, however, have shown an improvement in HbA1c in individuals with type 1 diabetes who participate in regular physical activity. 3. Hormonal adaptations to exercise are lost in those with type 1 diabetes. Lack of insulin can result in an excessive release of counterinsulin hormones during exercise (glucagons) and an increase in blood glucose and ketones and even precipitate ketoacidosis. 4. Recommendations for those participating in exercise: Exercise in the elderly Decreases in insulin resistance in the elderly are partly due to lack of physical activity. Progressive decreases in fitness, muscle mass and strength with aging can be preventable with regular physical activity.
The importance of promoting exercise is a vital component of prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. The benefits of physical activity are probably greatest with insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance. For those with type 1 diabetes, the emphasis should be on adjusting the regime of insulin and diet to allow for safe participation in physical activity.
Very thorough review of physical activity in those with diabetes mellitus. All health professionals providing care for those with diabetes should review this article.
Quality Criteria Checklist: Review Articles
|
|||
Relevance Questions | |||
1. | Will the answer if true, have a direct bearing on the health of patients? | Yes | |
2. | Is the outcome or topic something that patients/clients/population groups would care about? | Yes | |
3. | Is the problem addressed in the review one that is relevant to dietetics practice? | Yes | |
4. | Will the information, if true, require a change in practice? | Yes | |
Validity Questions | |||
1. | Was the question for the review clearly focused and appropriate? | Yes | |
2. | Was the search strategy used to locate relevant studies comprehensive? Were the databases searched and the search termsused described? | No | |
3. | Were explicit methods used to select studies to include in the review? Were inclusion/exclusion criteria specified andappropriate? Wereselectionmethods unbiased? | No | |
4. | Was there an appraisal of the quality and validity of studies included in the review? Were appraisal methodsspecified,appropriate, andreproducible? | No | |
5. | Were specific treatments/interventions/exposures described? Were treatments similar enough to be combined? | Yes | |
6. | Was the outcome of interest clearly indicated? Were other potential harms and benefits considered? | Yes | |
7. | Were processes for data abstraction, synthesis, and analysis described? Were they applied consistently acrossstudies and groups? Was thereappropriate use of qualitative and/or quantitative synthesis? Was variation in findings among studies analyzed? Were heterogeneity issued considered? If data from studies were aggregated for meta-analysis, was the procedure described? | No | |
8. | Are the results clearly presented in narrative and/or quantitative terms? If summary statistics are used, are levels ofsignificance and/or confidence intervals included? | Yes | |
9. | Are conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? Are limitations ofthe review identified anddiscussed? | Yes | |
10. | Was bias due to the review's funding or sponsorship unlikely? | Yes | |