Individualized Nutrition Support (2025)
-
Intervention
In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the association between individualized nutrition support compared to standard care and length of stay?
-
Conclusion
In adults with hematologic cancers, the association between individualized nutrition support compared to standard care and length of stay is uncertain secondary to very serious risk of bias and imprecision.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the association between individualized nutrition support compared to standard care and length of stay?
- Detail
- Worksheets
- Skaarud K, Hjermstad M, Bye A, Veierød M, Gudmundstuen A, Lundin K, Distante S, Brinch L, Tjønnfjord G, Iversen P. Effects of individualized nutrition after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following myeloablative conditioning; a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition 2018; 28:59-66
- Tavakoli-Ardakani M, Neman B, Mehdizadeh M, Hajifathali A, Salamzadeh J, Tabarraee M. Clinical effect of individualized parenteral nutrition vs conventional method in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2013; 48:958-962
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: ONC: Nutrition Support for Hematologic Cancers (2025)
In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the effect of individualized nutrition support compared to standard care on nutrition status?-
Conclusion
In adults with hematologic cancers, the effect of individualized nutrition support compared to standard care on nutrition status is uncertain secondary to serious risk of bias and very serious imprecision.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the effect of individualized nutrition support compared to standard care on nutrition status?
-
Search Plan and Results: ONC: Nutrition Support for Hematologic Cancers (2025)
In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the association between individualized nutrition support compared to standard care and weight?-
Conclusion
In adults with hematologic cancers, the association between individualized nutrition support compared to standard care and weight is uncertain secondary to very serious risk of bias and imprecision.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the association between individualized nutrition support compared to standard care and weight?
- Detail
- Worksheets
- Skaarud K, Hjermstad M, Bye A, Veierød M, Gudmundstuen A, Lundin K, Distante S, Brinch L, Tjønnfjord G, Iversen P. Effects of individualized nutrition after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following myeloablative conditioning; a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition 2018; 28:59-66
- Tavakoli-Ardakani M, Neman B, Mehdizadeh M, Hajifathali A, Salamzadeh J, Tabarraee M. Clinical effect of individualized parenteral nutrition vs conventional method in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2013; 48:958-962
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: ONC: Nutrition Support for Hematologic Cancers (2025)
In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the effect of individualized nutrition support compared to standard care on quality of life?-
Conclusion
In adults with hematologic concerns, the effect of individualized nutrition support compared to standard care on quality of life is uncertain secondary to serious risk of bias and very serious imprecision.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with hematologic cancers, what is the effect of individualized nutrition support compared to standard care on quality of life?
-
Search Plan and Results: ONC: Nutrition Support for Hematologic Cancers (2025)
-
Conclusion