Recommendations Summary
AWM: Multiple Behavior Therapy Strategies 2014
Click here to see the explanation of recommendation ratings (Strong, Fair, Weak, Consensus, Insufficient Evidence) and labels (Imperative or Conditional). To see more detail on the evidence from which the following recommendations were drawn, use the hyperlinks in the Supporting Evidence Section below.
-
Recommendation(s)
AWM: Multiple Behavior Therapy Strategies
For weight loss and weight maintenance, the registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) should incorporate one or more of the following strategies for behavior therapy:
- Self monitoring: Strong evidence shows that for adults who need or desire to lose weight or for adults who are maintaining body weight following weight loss, self-monitoring of food intake improves nutrition-related outcomes related to weight loss and weight maintenance
- Motivational interviewing: Research demonstrated that motivational interviewing significantly enhanced adherence to program recommendations and improved targeted diet-related outcomes including glycemic control, percentage of energy intake from fat, fruit and vegetable intake and weight loss
- Structured meal plans and meal replacements and portion control: Research reports that the use of various types of meal replacements or structured meal plans was helpful in achieving health and food behavior change and strong evidence documents a positive relationship between portion size and body weight
- Goal-setting: Clients' active participation in selecting and setting goals led to the selection of a goal from the area that could use the most improvement and the goal that was most personally appropriate
- Problem-solving: Studies based on the use of problem-solving strategies resulted in improvements in key outcome measures, including maintenance of weight loss and in subjects with diabetes, was linked to improvements in fat consumption, self-efficacy and physical activity.
Rating: Strong
ImperativeAWM: Consider Use of Additional Behavior Therapy Strategies
For weight loss and weight maintenance, the RDN may consider using the following behavior therapy strategies:
- Cognitive restructuring
- Contingency management
- Relapse prevention techniques
- Slowing the rate of eating
- Social support
- Stress management
- Stimulus control and cue reduction.
Rating: Fair
Imperative-
Risks/Harms of Implementing This Recommendation
None.
-
Conditions of Application
None.
-
Potential Costs Associated with Application
Costs of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) sessions vary, however MNT sessions are essential for improved outcomes.
-
Recommendation Narrative
From the Nutrition Counseling Project
- Three RCTs (two positive-quality and one neutral-quality) provide evidence that self-monitoring of food intake improves nutrition-related outcomes related to weight loss (Boutelle et al, 1999; Tate et al, 2003) and compliance with renal diets (Milas et al, 2002). Three observational studies of neutral quality revealed that clients enrolled in cognitive behavioral weight-loss programs that were successful in losing weight were significantly more consistent with self-monitoring (Baker et al, 1998; Mattfeldt-Beman et al, 1999; Streit et al, 1991).
- Four RCTs (three positive-quality and one neutral-quality) assessed the efficacy of various types of meal replacement or structured meal plan strategies, as compared to self-selected diets in middle aged-adults and found the use of various types of meal replacements or structured meal plans helpful in achieving health and food behavior change in middle-aged adults (Wing et al, 1996; Metz et al, 1997; Ditschuneit et al, 1999; Flechter-Mors et al, 2000; Ashley et al, 2001; Ditschuneit and Flechter-Mors, 2001). Additional research is needed to determine if benefits derived from temporary use of these behavioral strategies can be sustained over time.
- Two positive-quality (one RCT and one meta-analysis) and one neutral-quality RCT found monetary rewards or reinforcement had no treatment effect (Jeffery and Wing, 1995; Fuller et al, 1998; Paul-Ebhohimhen and Avenell, 2007)
- Two positive-quality RCTs, one in overweight and obese women and the other in post-menopausal women with diabetes, utilized interventions that incorporated problem-solving strategies (Perri et al, 2001; Glasgow et al, 2004). In both studies, use of problem-solving strategies resulted in improvements in key outcome measures, including maintenance of weight loss and in subjects with diabetes, was linked to improvements in fat consumption, self-efficacy and physical activity.
- One highly intense lifestyle change study found social support was helpful and four traditional lifestyle change programs did not find it helpful (Wing et al, 1991; Wing et al, 1999; Barrera et al, 2002; Barrera et al, 2006; Toobert et al, 2007). The definition of social support has evolved to include multiple dimensions of social support measured pre- and post-treatment. Two RCTs conducted in the 1990s manipulated social support and found no significant treatment effect. In an RCT published in 2006, multiple dimensions of social support were measured pre- and post-treatment and use of social resources was shown to mediate intervention effects on physical activity, fat consumption and HgA1C change. Additional studies are needed to measure impact of social support interventions on outcomes.
- One positive-quality RCT found a 30-minute motivational interviewing session, based on self-selected diabetic self-management goals, followed by three 10-minute phone calls at one week, three weeks and seven weeks, was significantly more effective than usual care in reducing dietary fat intake and increasing physical activity at one year in 100 adults with type 2 diabetes (Clark et al, 2004). A positive-quality RCT showed similar results regarding the value of clients' self-selected behavior change goals and demonstrated the effectiveness of goal-attainment training in realizing dietary improvements (Berry et al, 1989). One neutral-quality observational study found 422 clients with diabetes who used computer technology to self-select a behavior-change goal in an area of diet or exercise and received brief (eight to 10 minutes) counseling related to the goal, were successful in reducing fat intake two months later (Estabrook et al, 2005). Clients' active participation in selecting and setting goals led to the selection of a goal from the area that could use the most improvement and the goal that was most personally appropriate.
- One neutral-quality RCT assessed the additive effect of a cognitive restructuring component to a 10-week strictly behavioral weight-loss program in 63 middle-aged overweight subjects and found no significant difference between the treatment group and control group in any physiological, behavioral or cognitive measures at baseline, post-treatment and at three-month follow-up (DeLucia and Kalodner, 1990). Additional research is needed on the isolated effect of cognitive restructuring as part of a behavioral intervention on nutrition-related outcomes.
- Four RCTs of positive quality assessed the effect of motivational interviewing as an added component to cognitive-behavioral programs [three studies (Smith et al, 1997; Bowen et al, 2002; West et al, 2007)] or a self-help intervention (Resnicow et al, 2001) and found motivational interviewing significantly enhanced adherence to program recommendations and improved targeted diet-related outcomes including glycemic control, percentage of energy intake from fat, fruit and vegetable intake and weight loss.
From the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) Nutrition Evidence Library (NEL) Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews
- What is the relationship between diet self-monitoring and body weight?
- Strong evidence shows that for adults who need or desire to lose weight or who are maintaining body weight following weight loss, self-monitoring of food intake improves outcomes.
- What is the relationship between portion size and body weight?
- Strong evidence documents a positive relationship between portion size and body weight.
-
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- The eight Conclusion Statements from the Nutrition Counseling project in support of this recommendation received the following grades:
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of self-monitoring, used as a component of a behavioral program, will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade I
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of meal replacements or structured meal plans, used as a component of a behavioral program, will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade I
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of reward and reinforcement (contingency management), used as a component of a behavioral intervention, will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade I
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of problem-solving will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade II
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of social support will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade II
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of goal-setting will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade II
- What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of cognitive restructuring will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade III
- What is the evidence that Motivational Interviewing, used as an adjunct to a cognitive-behavioral program, results in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting? Grade I
- The Conclusion Statements for Energy Balance and Weight Management, Food Environment and Dietary Behaviors in support of this recommendation both received a grade of Strong.
- The eight Conclusion Statements from the Nutrition Counseling project in support of this recommendation received the following grades:
-
Minority Opinions
Consensus reached.
-
Supporting Evidence
The recommendations were created from the evidence analysis on the following questions. To see detail of the evidence analysis, click the blue hyperlinks below (recommendations rated consensus will not have supporting evidence linked).
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of self-monitoring, used as a component of a behavioral program, will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting?
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of meal replacements or structured meal plans, used as a component of a behavioral program, will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting?
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of reward and reinforcement (contingency management), used as a component of a behavioral intervention, will result in health/food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient/clinic setting?
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of problem-solving will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting?
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of social support will result in health/food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient/clinic setting?
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of goal-setting will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting?
What is the evidence that the behavioral strategy of cognitive restructuring will result in health or food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient or clinic setting?
What is the evidence that Motivational Interviewing, used as an adjunct to a cognitive-behavioral program, results in health/food behavior change in adults counseled in an outpatient/clinic setting?-
References
Weight control during the holidays: Highly consistent self-monitoring as a potentially useful coping mechanism. Health Psych 1998;17(4):367-370.
How can obese weight controllers minimize weight gain during the high risk holiday season? By self-monitoring very consistently. Health Psychol 1999;18(4):364-368.
Mattfeldt-Beman MK, Corrigan SA, Stevens, VJ, Sugars CP, Dalcin AT, Givi J, Copeland K. Participants' evaluation of a weight-loss program. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99:66-71.
Milas NC, Nowalk MP, Akpele L, Castaldo L, Coyne T, Doroshenko L, Kigawa L, Korzec-Ramirez D, Scherch LK, Snetselaar L. Factors associated with adherence to the dietary protein intervention in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Nov; 95 (11): 1,295-1,300.
Streit KJ, Stevens NH, Stevens VJ, Rossner J. Food records: A predictor and modifier of weight change in a long-term weight loss program. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991; 91 (2): 213-216.
Effects of internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289:1833-1836.
Ashley JM, St. Jeor ST, Schrage JP, Perumean-Chaney SE, Gilbertson MC, McCall NL, Bovee V. Weight control in the physician's office. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1599-1604.
Ditschuneit HH, Flechter-Mors M. Value of structured meals for weight management: risk factors and long-term weight maintenance. Obes Res 2001; 9: 284-289S.
Ditschuneit HH, Flechter-Mors M, Johnson TD, Adler G. Metabolic and weight-loss effects of a long-term dietary intervention in obese patients. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69(2): 198-204.
Flechter-Mors M, Ditschuneit HH, Johnson TD, Suchard MA, Adler G. Metabolic and weight loss effects of long-term dietary intervention in obese patients: four-year results. Obes Res 2000; 8(5): 399-402.
Metz JA, Kris-Etherton PM, Morris CD. Dietary compliance and cardiovascular risk reduction with a prepared meal plan compared with a self-selected diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997; 66: 373-385.
Wing RR, Jeffery RW, Burton LR, Thorson C, Nissinoff KS, Baxter JE. Food provision vs. structured meal plans in the behavioral treatment of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996 Jan; 20 (1): 56-62.
Fuller PR, Perri MG, Leermakers EA, Guyer LK. Effects of a personalized system of skill acquisition and an educational program in the treatment of obesity. Addictive Behaviors,1998, 23 (1): 97-100.
Jeffery RW and Wing RR. Long-term effects of interventions for weight loss using food provision and monetary incentives. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Oct; 63 (5): 793-796.
Paul-Ebhohimhen V and Avenell A. "Systematic review of the use of financial incentives in treatments for obesity and overweight." Obesity Reviews, 2007 October 23: 1-13.
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Barrera M, Strycker LA. Assessment of problem-solving: a key to successful diabetes self-management. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2004 27 (5): 477-490.
Perri MG, Nezu AM, McKelvey WF, Shermer RL, Renjilian DA, Viegener BJ. Relapse prevention training and problem-solving therapy in the long-term management of obesity. 2001, August; 69 (4): 722-726.
Barrera M, Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Boles SM, Feil EG. Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support?: An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2002. 30 (5): 637-654.
Barrera M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychology. 2006; 11 (3): 483-495.
Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Barrera M Jr, Ritzwoller DP, Weidner G. Long-term effects of the Mediterranean lifestyle program: a randomized clinical trial for postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Jan 17; 4:1.
Wing RR, Marcus MD, Epstein LH, Jawad A. A "family-based" approach to the treatment of obese type II diabetic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb; 59 (1): 156-162.
Wing RR, Jeffery RW. Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999 Feb; 67 (1): 132-138.
Berry MW, Danish SJ, Rinke WJ, Smiciklas-Wright H. Work-site health promotion: the effects of a goal-setting program on nutrition-related behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc. 1989; 89 (7): 914-920, 923.
Clark M, Hampson SE, Avery L, Simpson R. Effects of a tailored lifestyle self-management intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Sep; 9 (Pt 3): 365-379.
Estabrooks PA, Nelson CC, Xu S, King D, Bayliss EA, Gaglio B, Nutting PA, Glasgow RE. The frequency and behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun; 31 (3): 391-400.
Shilts MK, Horowitz M, Townsend MS. Goal-setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: A review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2004 Nov-Dec; 19 (2): 81-93.
DeLucia JL, Kalodner CR. An individualized cognitive intervention: Does it increase the efficacy of behavioral interventions for obesity? Addict Behav. 1990; 15 (5): 473-479.
Bowen D, Ehret C, Pedersen M, Snetselaar L, Johnson M, Tinker L, Hollinger D, Lichty I, Bland K, Sivertsen D, Ocken D, Staats L, Beedoe J W. Results of an adjunt dietary intervention program in the Women's Health Initiative. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2002; 102 (11): 1,631-1,637.
Resnicow K, Jackson A, Wang T, De AK, McCarty F, Dudley WN, Baranowski T. A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through black churches: results of the Eat for Life Trial. American Journal of Public Health. 2001; 91 (10): 1,686-1,692.
Smith DE, Heckemeyer CM, Kratt PP, Mason DA. Motivational interviewing to improve adherence to behavioral weight-cotnrol program for older obese women with NIDDM. Diabetes Care.1997; 20 (1): 52-54.
West DS, DiLillo V, Bursac Z, Gore SA, Greene PG. Motivational interviewing improves weight loss in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (5): 1,081-1,087. -
References not graded in Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Process
- 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) Nutrition Evidence Library (NEL) Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews. Available at http://www.nutritionevidencelibrary.gov/category.cfm?cid=21.
- Avenell A, Broom J, Brown TJ, Poobalan A, Aucott L, Stearns SC, Smith WC, Jung RT, Campbell MK, Grant AM. Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8 (21): iii-iv, 1-182.
- Shaw K, O'Rourke P, Del Mar C, Kenardy J. Psychological interventions for overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18; (2): CD003818.
-
References