MiOA: Intervention: Community: Registered Dietitian Nutritionists' Interventions (2023)
-
Intervention
In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on calorie and protein intake?
-
Conclusion
Registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions may increase calorie and protein intake in older adults living in the community.
-
Grade: Low (C)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on calorie and protein intake?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Kim C, Jeong Y, Park Y, Bae J, Kwon Y, Cho M, Yoo C, Lee K. Reinforcement Effects of Social Network Intervention during Nutritional Supplementation in Frail Older Adults. Gerontology 2021; 67:620-632
- Lammes E, Rydwik E, Akner G. Effects of nutritional intervention and physical training on energy intake, resting metabolic rate and body composition in frail elderly. a randomised, controlled pilot study. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2012; 16:162-167
- Locher J, Vickers K, Buys D, Ellis A, Lawrence J, Newton L, Roth D, Ritchie C, Bales C. A randomized controlled trial of a theoretically-based behavioral nutrition intervention for community elders: lessons learned from the Behavioral Nutrition Intervention for Community Elders Study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2013; 113:1675-1682
- Payette H, Boutier V, Coulombe C, Gray-Donald K. Benefits of nutritional supplementation in free-living, frail, undernourished elderly people: a prospective randomized community trial. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2002; 102:1088-1095
- Reinders I, Visser M, Jyväkorpi S, Niskanen R, Bosmans J, Jornada Ben Â, Brouwer I, Kuijper L, Olthof M, Pitkälä K, Vijlbrief R, Suominen M, Wijnhoven H. The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Nutrition 2022; 61:505-520
- Rydwik E, Lammes E, Frändin K, Akner G. Effects of a physical and nutritional intervention program for frail elderly people over age 75. A randomized controlled pilot treatment trial. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2008; 20:159-170
- Schilp J, Kruizenga H, Wijnhoven H, van Binsbergen J, Visser M. Effects of a dietetic treatment in older, undernourished, community-dwelling individuals in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. European journal of nutrition 2013; 52:1939-1948
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: MiOA: Intervention Medical Nutrition Therapy 2023
In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on weight?-
Conclusion
Registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions may help maintain or slightly increase body weight in older adults considered malnourished or at risk for malnutrition living in the community.
-
Grade: Low (C)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on weight?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Lammes E, Rydwik E, Akner G. Effects of nutritional intervention and physical training on energy intake, resting metabolic rate and body composition in frail elderly. a randomised, controlled pilot study. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2012; 16:162-167
- Locher J, Vickers K, Buys D, Ellis A, Lawrence J, Newton L, Roth D, Ritchie C, Bales C. A randomized controlled trial of a theoretically-based behavioral nutrition intervention for community elders: lessons learned from the Behavioral Nutrition Intervention for Community Elders Study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2013; 113:1675-1682
- Nykänen I, Rissanen T, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S. Effects of individual dietary counseling as part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) on nutritional status: a population-based intervention study. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2014; 18:54-58
- Payette H, Boutier V, Coulombe C, Gray-Donald K. Benefits of nutritional supplementation in free-living, frail, undernourished elderly people: a prospective randomized community trial. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2002; 102:1088-1095
- Rydwik E, Lammes E, Frändin K, Akner G. Effects of a physical and nutritional intervention program for frail elderly people over age 75. A randomized controlled pilot treatment trial. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2008; 20:159-170
- Schilp J, Kruizenga H, Wijnhoven H, van Binsbergen J, Visser M. Effects of a dietetic treatment in older, undernourished, community-dwelling individuals in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. European journal of nutrition 2013; 52:1939-1948
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: MiOA: Intervention Medical Nutrition Therapy 2023
In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on physical function?-
Conclusion
Registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions may have little to no effect on physical function (handgrip strength, gait speed, or actvities of daily living) in older adults living in the community.
-
Grade: Low (C)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on physical function?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Endevelt R, Lemberger J, Bregman J, Kowen G, Berger-Fecht I, Lander H, Karpati T, Shahar D. Intensive dietary intervention by a dietitian as a case manager among community dwelling older adults: the EDIT study. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2011; 15:624-30
- Kim C, Jeong Y, Park Y, Bae J, Kwon Y, Cho M, Yoo C, Lee K. Reinforcement Effects of Social Network Intervention during Nutritional Supplementation in Frail Older Adults. Gerontology 2021; 67:620-632
- Kwon J, Yoshida Y, Yoshida H, Kim H, Suzuki T, Lee Y. Effects of a combined physical training and nutrition intervention on physical performance and health-related quality of life in prefrail older women living in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2015; 16:263.e1-8
- Locher J, Vickers K, Buys D, Ellis A, Lawrence J, Newton L, Roth D, Ritchie C, Bales C. A randomized controlled trial of a theoretically-based behavioral nutrition intervention for community elders: lessons learned from the Behavioral Nutrition Intervention for Community Elders Study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2013; 113:1675-1682
- Reinders I, Visser M, Jyväkorpi S, Niskanen R, Bosmans J, Jornada Ben Â, Brouwer I, Kuijper L, Olthof M, Pitkälä K, Vijlbrief R, Suominen M, Wijnhoven H. The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Nutrition 2022; 61:505-520
- Rydwik E, Lammes E, Frändin K, Akner G. Effects of a physical and nutritional intervention program for frail elderly people over age 75. A randomized controlled pilot treatment trial. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2008; 20:159-170
- Rydwik E, Frändin K, Akner G. Effects of a physical training and nutritional intervention program in frail elderly people regarding habitual physical activity level and activities of daily living--a randomized controlled pilot study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2010; 51:283-289
- Schilp J, Kruizenga H, Wijnhoven H, van Binsbergen J, Visser M. Effects of a dietetic treatment in older, undernourished, community-dwelling individuals in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. European journal of nutrition 2013; 52:1939-1948
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: MiOA: Intervention Medical Nutrition Therapy 2023
In older adults living in the community, what is the cost effectiveness of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions?-
Conclusion
Registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions may not be cost effective, measured by quality-adjusted life year (QALY), compared to standard care in older adults living in the community.
-
Grade: Low (C)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In older adults living in the community, what is the cost effectiveness of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Reinders I, Visser M, Jyväkorpi S, Niskanen R, Bosmans J, Jornada Ben Â, Brouwer I, Kuijper L, Olthof M, Pitkälä K, Vijlbrief R, Suominen M, Wijnhoven H. The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Nutrition 2022; 61:505-520
- Schilp J, Kruizenga H, Wijnhoven H, van Binsbergen J, Visser M. Effects of a dietetic treatment in older, undernourished, community-dwelling individuals in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. European journal of nutrition 2013; 52:1939-1948
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: MiOA: Intervention Medical Nutrition Therapy 2023
In older adults living in the community, what is the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on nutrition status or mortality?-
Conclusion
No studies were identified that evaluated the effect of registered dietitian nutritionists' interventions on nutrition status or mortality in older adults living in the community.
-
Grade: V
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Search Plan and Results: MiOA: Intervention Medical Nutrition Therapy 2023
-
Conclusion