CRDA: Other Outcomes (2023)
-
Intervention
In adults with type 2 diabetes, what is the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction compared to higher CHO diets on adverse events?
-
Conclusion
Evidence is unclear regarding intake of a moderate-carbohydrate (CHO) diet compared to a higher CHO intake on adverse events in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), what is the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction compared to higher CHO diets on adverse events?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Guldbrand H, Dizdar B, Bunjaku B, Lindström T, Bachrach-Lindström M, Fredrikson M, Ostgren C, Nystrom F. In type 2 diabetes, randomisation to advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet transiently improves glycaemic control compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet producing a similar weight loss. Diabetologia 2012; 55:2118-2127
- Sato J, Kanazawa A, Makita S, Hatae C, Komiya K, Shimizu T, Ikeda F, Tamura Y, Ogihara T, Mita T, Goto H, Uchida T, Miyatsuka T, Takeno K, Shimada S, Ohmura C, Watanabe T, Kobayashi K, Miura Y, Iwaoka M, Hirashima N, Fujitani Y, Watada H. A randomized controlled trial of 130 g/day low-carbohydrate diet in type 2 diabetes with poor glycemic control. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2017; 36:992-1000
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: CRDA: Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 2023
In adults with type 2 diabetes, what is the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction compared to higher CHO diets on quality of life (QoL)?-
Conclusion
Evidence suggests that intake of a moderate-carbohydrate (CHO) diet compared to a higher CHO intake may have little or no effect on physical or mental quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with type 2 diabetes, what is the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction compared to higher CHO diets on quality of life?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Guldbrand H, Lindström T, Dizdar B, Bunjaku B, Östgren C, Nystrom F, Bachrach-Lindström M. Randomization to a low-carbohydrate diet advice improves health related quality of life compared with a low-fat diet at similar weight-loss in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2014; 106:221-227
- Watson N, Dyer K, Buckley J, Brinkworth G, Coates A, Parfitt G, Howe P, Noakes M, Murphy K. Comparison of two low-fat diets, differing in protein and carbohydrate, on psychological wellbeing in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial. Nutrition Journal 2018; 17:62
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: CRDA: Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 2023
-
Conclusion