academy of nutrition and dietetics
  • Home
  • Projects
    • Adult Weight Management
    • Advanced Technology in Food Production
    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Breastfeeding
    • Celiac Disease
    • Chronic Kidney Disease
    • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    • Critical Illness
    • Cystic Fibrosis
    • Diabetes: Type 1 (Pediatrics)
    • Diabetes: Types1 and 2
    • Diabetes: Prevention of Type 2
    • Dietary Patterns
    • Disorders of Lipid Metabolism
    • Energy Expenditure
    • Gestational Diabetes
    • Heart Failure
    • Hypertension
    • Malnutrition: Older Adults (65+)
    • Malnutrition: Adults (18+)
    • Malnutrition in Pregnancy
    • Medical Nutrition Therapy
    • Nutrition Guidance in Healthy Children
    • Nutrition Screening Adults
    • Nutrition Screening Pediatrics
    • Nutritional Genomics
    • Oncology
    • Pediatric Weight Management
    • Preterm Infant (VLBW) Enteral Nutrition
    • Physical Activity and Nutrition
    • Retail Nutrition
    • Transgender Nutrition
    • Umami
    • Vegetarian Nutrition
    • Collaborative Guidelines and Joint Position-Consensus Statements
    image description
    Evidence Analysis Library Proven Research When It Matters Most Sign In
    Essential Evidence For continued Success.
  • Policy and Process
    • Overview
    • Evidence-Based Practice
    • EAL Systematic Review Process
    • EAL Guideline Development Process
    • EAL Policies and Procedures
    • Evidence Analysis Manual
    • Guideline Practitioner Guides
    image description
    Evidence Analysis Library Proven Research When It Matters Most Sign In
    Essential Evidence For continued Success.
  • Resources
    • Resources
    • EAC Orientation Tutorial
    • Presentations
    • Nutrition Care Process
    • Research Gaps
    • Guideline Implementation Resources
  • Index
  • About
    • About the EAL
    • Citing Content from the EAL
    • Permission to Reprint Content from the EAL
    • FAQs
    • Join the EAL Team - Volunteer
  • Risk ScreenMood Disorders
  • ResourcesMood Disorders
  • Login
  • Not A Member?
  • Contact us
  • Help
Home

  • Increase Font Size
  • Decrease Font Size
  • View as PDF
  • Grade Chart
  • Diabetes (DM) Guideline (2015)
    • DM: Executive Summary of Recommendations (2015)
    • DM: Introduction (2015)
      • DM: Introduction (2015)
      • DM: Scope of Guideline (2015)
      • DM: Statement of Intent (2015)
      • DM: Guideline Methods (2015)
      • DM: Specific Methods (2015)
      • DM: Implementation of the Guideline (2015)
      • DM: Benefits and Risks/Harms of Implementation (2015)
    • DM: Major Recommendations (2015)
    • DM: Background Information (2015)
    • DM: References (2015)
  • Diabetes (DM) Type 1 and 2 Systematic Review (2013-2015)
    • DM: Medical Nutrition Therapy (2015)
      • DM: Effectiveness of MNT Provided by RD/RDN (2015)
    • DM: Carbohydrate (2014)
      • DM: Carbohydrate Amount (2014)
      • DM: Carbohydrate Management Strategies (2014)
      • DM: Fiber (2014)
      • DM: Glycemic Index (2014)
      • DM: FDA-Approved Non-Nutritive Sweeteners (2014)
      • DM: Nutritive Sweeteners (2014)
    • DM: Fat (2014)
      • DM: Fat Amount (2014)
      • DM: Types of Fat (2014)
      • DM: Omega-3 Fatty Acids (2014)
    • DM: Protein (2014)
      • DM: Protein Amount (2014)
      • DM: Types of Protein (Vegetable-Based vs. Animal-Based)

  • Intervention
    Are there specific interventions (for at least 1 year) in the prevention of type 2 diabetes?
    • Conclusion

      Two studies report that the risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases with increasing body weight. 

      Interventions based on nutrition therapy or physical activity and intensive lifestyle interventions, involving both nutrition therapy and physical activity are effective at reducing incidence of type 2 diabetes.

      Interventions involving pharmacotherapy are also effective at reducing incidence of type 2 diabetes, however, in all but one study, lifestyle interventions were more effective than pharmacotherapy.

      Two studies regarding consumption of specific nutrients, such as antioxidants and sugar, have not been shown to have a significant effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes.

    • Grade: I
      • Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
      • Grade II is Fair;
      • Grade III is Limited/Weak;
      • Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
      • Grade V is Not Assignable.
      • High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
      • Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
      • Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
      • Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
      • Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
    • Evidence Summary: What is the evidence supporting specific interventions (for at least 1 year) in the prevention of type 2 diabetes?
      • Detail
      • Quality Rating Summary
        For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
      • Worksheets
        • Ebbesson SOE, Ebbesson LOE, Swenson M, Kennish JM, Robbins DC. A successful diabetes prevention study in Eskimos: The Alaskan Siberia Project. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2005; 64: 409-424.
        • Janket SJ, Manson JE, Sesso H, Buring JE, Liu S. A Prospective Study of Sugar Intake and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women. Diabetes Care, 2003; 26 (4): 1,008-1,015.
        • Watanabe M, Yokotsuka M, Yamaoka K, Tango T. Randomized controlled trial of a new dietary education program to prevent type 2 diabetes in a high-risk group of Japanese male workers. Diabetes Care, 2003: 3,209-3,214.
        • Yamaoka K, Tango T. Efficacy of lifestyle education to prevent type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28 (11): 2,780-2,786.
    • Search Plan and Results: Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes 2006
       
 
Close

Copyright 2025 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy), All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy. LX-133-78