AWM: Interventions in Primary Care or Outpatient Settings (2020-21)
-
Intervention
In adults with overweight or obesity, what are adverse events of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN?
-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian likely do not result in serious adverse events. Minor diet-related events such as dry skin or gastrointestinal symptoms were noted infrequently.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what are adverse events of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the cost-effectiveness of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting may be cost-effective.
-
Grade: Very Low (D)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the cost-effectiveness of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on blood pressure?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting likely result in little to no difference in blood pressure.
-
Grade: Moderate (B)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on blood pressure?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Al-Hamdan R, Avery A, Salter A, Al-Disi D, Al-Daghri NM, McCullough F. Identification of Education Models to Improve Health Outcomes in Arab Women with Pre-Diabetes. Nutrients 2019; 11:1113
- Assunção M, Gigante D, Cardoso M, Sartorelli D, Santos I. Randomized, controlled trial promotes physical activity and reduces consumption of sweets and sodium among overweight and obese adults. Nutrition Research 2010; 30:541-549
- Barratt R, Frost G, Millward D, Truby H. A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention v. standard care in adults with type 2 diabetes immediately after initiating insulin therapy. The British Journal of Nutrition 2008; 99:1025-1031
- Bennett G, Herring S, Puleo E, Stein E, Emmons K, Gillman M. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 2010; 18:308-313
- Bennett G, Steinberg D, Askew S, Levine E, Foley P, Batch B, Svetkey L, Bosworth H, Puleo E, Brewer A, DeVries A, Miranda H. Effectiveness of an app and provider counseling for obesity treatment in primary care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2018; 55:777-786
- Bove K, Nilsson M, Pedersen L, Mikkelsen N, Suhrs H, Astrup A, Prescott E. Comprehensive treatment of microvascular angina in overweight women - a randomized controlled pilot trial. PloS One 2020; 15:e0240722
- Gallagher R, Kirkness A, Zelestis E, Hollams D, Kneale C, Armari E, Bennett T, Daly J, Tofler G. A randomised trial of a weight loss intervention for overweight and obese people diagnosed with coronary heart disease and/or type 2 diabetes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2012; 44:119-128
- Hardcastle S, Taylor A, Bailey M, Harley R, Hagger M. Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomised controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2013; 10:40
- Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, Lavori P, Wilson S, Rosas L, Stafford R. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173:113-121
- Nilsen V, Bakke P, Gallefoss F. Effects of lifestyle intervention in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus - results from a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:893
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on BMI?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting may reduce BMI.
-
Grade: Low (C)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on BMI?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Al-Hamdan R, Avery A, Salter A, Al-Disi D, Al-Daghri NM, McCullough F. Identification of Education Models to Improve Health Outcomes in Arab Women with Pre-Diabetes. Nutrients 2019; 11:1113
- Assunção M, Gigante D, Cardoso M, Sartorelli D, Santos I. Randomized, controlled trial promotes physical activity and reduces consumption of sweets and sodium among overweight and obese adults. Nutrition Research 2010; 30:541-549
- Barratt R, Frost G, Millward D, Truby H. A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention v. standard care in adults with type 2 diabetes immediately after initiating insulin therapy. The British Journal of Nutrition 2008; 99:1025-1031
- Bennett G, Herring S, Puleo E, Stein E, Emmons K, Gillman M. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 2010; 18:308-313
- Bennett G, Steinberg D, Askew S, Levine E, Foley P, Batch B, Svetkey L, Bosworth H, Puleo E, Brewer A, DeVries A, Miranda H. Effectiveness of an app and provider counseling for obesity treatment in primary care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2018; 55:777-786
- de Freitas P, de Menezes M, Dos Santos L, Pimenta A, Ferreira A, Lopes A. The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:652
- de Vos B, Runhaar J, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Effectiveness of a tailor-made weight loss intervention in primary care. European Journal of Nutrition 2014; 53:95-104
- Abd El-Kader SM ,Al-Jiffri OH, Neamatallah ZA ,AlKhateeb AF ,AlFawaz SS. Weight reduction ameliorates inflammatory cytokines, adipocytokines and endothelial dysfunction biomarkers among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes. African Health Sciences 2020; 20:1329-1336
- Gallagher R, Kirkness A, Zelestis E, Hollams D, Kneale C, Armari E, Bennett T, Daly J, Tofler G. A randomised trial of a weight loss intervention for overweight and obese people diagnosed with coronary heart disease and/or type 2 diabetes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2012; 44:119-128
- Gandler N, Simmance N, Keenan J, Choong P, Dowsey M. A pilot study investigating dietetic weight loss interventions and 12 month functional outcomes of patients undergoing total joint replacement. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice 2016; 10:220-223
- Hardcastle S, Taylor A, Bailey M, Harley R, Hagger M. Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomised controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2013; 10:40
- Huseinovic E, Bertz F, Brekke H, Winkvist A. Two-year follow-up of a postpartum weight loss intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Maternal & Child Nutrition 2018; 14:e12539
- Jiang X, Fan X, Wu R, Geng F, Hu C. The effect of care intervention for obese patients with type II diabetes. Medicine 2017; 96:e7524
- Karintrakul S, Angkatavanich J. A randomized controlled trial of an individualized nutrition counseling program matched with a transtheoretical model for overweight and obese females in Thailand. Nutrition Research and Practice 2017; 11:319-326
- Liljensøe A, Laursen J, Bliddal H, Søballe K, Mechlenburg I. Weight loss intervention before total knee replacement: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2021; 110:3-12
- Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, Lavori P, Wilson S, Rosas L, Stafford R. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173:113-121
- Nilsen V, Bakke P, Gallefoss F. Effects of lifestyle intervention in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus - results from a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:893
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on fasting blood glucose?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity but without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting likely results in little to no difference in fasting blood glucose. However, interventions may improve fasting blood glucose for individuals with overweight or obesity and T2DM in a primary care/outpatient setting.
-
Grade: Moderate (B)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on fasting blood glucose?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Al-Hamdan R, Avery A, Salter A, Al-Disi D, Al-Daghri NM, McCullough F. Identification of Education Models to Improve Health Outcomes in Arab Women with Pre-Diabetes. Nutrients 2019; 11:1113
- Bennett G, Steinberg D, Askew S, Levine E, Foley P, Batch B, Svetkey L, Bosworth H, Puleo E, Brewer A, DeVries A, Miranda H. Effectiveness of an app and provider counseling for obesity treatment in primary care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2018; 55:777-786
- de Freitas P, de Menezes M, Dos Santos L, Pimenta A, Ferreira A, Lopes A. The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:652
- Jiang X, Fan X, Wu R, Geng F, Hu C. The effect of care intervention for obese patients with type II diabetes. Medicine 2017; 96:e7524
- Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, Lavori P, Wilson S, Rosas L, Stafford R. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173:113-121
- Nilsen V, Bakke P, Gallefoss F. Effects of lifestyle intervention in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus - results from a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:893
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on percent weight loss?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting likely increase percent weight loss and the likelihood of achieving 5% weight loss.
-
Grade: Moderate (B)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on percent weight loss?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Al-Hamdan R, Avery A, Salter A, Al-Disi D, Al-Daghri NM, McCullough F. Identification of Education Models to Improve Health Outcomes in Arab Women with Pre-Diabetes. Nutrients 2019; 11:1113
- Assunção M, Gigante D, Cardoso M, Sartorelli D, Santos I. Randomized, controlled trial promotes physical activity and reduces consumption of sweets and sodium among overweight and obese adults. Nutrition Research 2010; 30:541-549
- Barratt R, Frost G, Millward D, Truby H. A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention v. standard care in adults with type 2 diabetes immediately after initiating insulin therapy. The British Journal of Nutrition 2008; 99:1025-1031
- Bennett G, Herring S, Puleo E, Stein E, Emmons K, Gillman M. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 2010; 18:308-313
- Bennett G, Steinberg D, Askew S, Levine E, Foley P, Batch B, Svetkey L, Bosworth H, Puleo E, Brewer A, DeVries A, Miranda H. Effectiveness of an app and provider counseling for obesity treatment in primary care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2018; 55:777-786
- Gallagher R, Kirkness A, Zelestis E, Hollams D, Kneale C, Armari E, Bennett T, Daly J, Tofler G. A randomised trial of a weight loss intervention for overweight and obese people diagnosed with coronary heart disease and/or type 2 diabetes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2012; 44:119-128
- Gandler N, Simmance N, Keenan J, Choong P, Dowsey M. A pilot study investigating dietetic weight loss interventions and 12 month functional outcomes of patients undergoing total joint replacement. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice 2016; 10:220-223
- Huseinovic E, Bertz F, Leu Agelii M, Hellebö Johansson E, Winkvist A, Brekke H. Effectiveness of a weight loss intervention in postpartum women: results from a randomized controlled trial in primary health care. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2016; 104:362-370
- Jiang X, Fan X, Wu R, Geng F, Hu C. The effect of care intervention for obese patients with type II diabetes. Medicine 2017; 96:e7524
- Karintrakul S, Angkatavanich J. A randomized controlled trial of an individualized nutrition counseling program matched with a transtheoretical model for overweight and obese females in Thailand. Nutrition Research and Practice 2017; 11:319-326
- Kesman R, Ebbert J, Harris K, Schroeder D. Portion control for the treatment of obesity in the primary care setting. BMC Research Notes 2011; 4:346
- Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, Lavori P, Wilson S, Rosas L, Stafford R. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173:113-121
- Ventura Marra M, Lilly C, Nelson K, Woofter D, Malone J. . A pilot randomized controlled trial of a telenutrition weight loss intervention in middle-aged and older men with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Nutrients 2019; 11:
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on quality of life?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting may result in little to no difference in quality of life.
-
Grade: Low (C)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on quality of life?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- de Vos B, Runhaar J, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Effectiveness of a tailor-made weight loss intervention in primary care. European Journal of Nutrition 2014; 53:95-104
- Hagberg L, Winkvist A, Brekke H,Bertz F,Hellebö Johansson E,Huseinovic E. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life of a diet intervention postpartum: 2-year results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:38
- Liljensøe A, Laursen J, Bliddal H, Søballe K, Mechlenburg I. Weight loss intervention before total knee replacement: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2021; 110:3-12
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on waist circumference?-
Conclusion
In adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian in a primary care/outpatient setting reduce waist circumference.
-
Grade: High (A)
- Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
- Grade II is Fair;
- Grade III is Limited/Weak;
- Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
- Grade V is Not Assignable.
- High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
- Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
- Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
- Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
- Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
-
Evidence Summary: In adults with overweight or obesity, what is the effect of weight management interventions provided by an RDN or international equivalent in the primary care or outpatient setting, compared to usual care or no intervention from an RDN, on waist circumference?
- Detail
- Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
- Worksheets
- Al-Hamdan R, Avery A, Salter A, Al-Disi D, Al-Daghri NM, McCullough F. Identification of Education Models to Improve Health Outcomes in Arab Women with Pre-Diabetes. Nutrients 2019; 11:1113
- Assunção M, Gigante D, Cardoso M, Sartorelli D, Santos I. Randomized, controlled trial promotes physical activity and reduces consumption of sweets and sodium among overweight and obese adults. Nutrition Research 2010; 30:541-549
- Barratt R, Frost G, Millward D, Truby H. A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention v. standard care in adults with type 2 diabetes immediately after initiating insulin therapy. The British Journal of Nutrition 2008; 99:1025-1031
- Bennett G, Herring S, Puleo E, Stein E, Emmons K, Gillman M. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 2010; 18:308-313
- Bennett G, Steinberg D, Askew S, Levine E, Foley P, Batch B, Svetkey L, Bosworth H, Puleo E, Brewer A, DeVries A, Miranda H. Effectiveness of an app and provider counseling for obesity treatment in primary care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2018; 55:777-786
- Bove K, Nilsson M, Pedersen L, Mikkelsen N, Suhrs H, Astrup A, Prescott E. Comprehensive treatment of microvascular angina in overweight women - a randomized controlled pilot trial. PloS One 2020; 15:e0240722
- de Freitas P, de Menezes M, Dos Santos L, Pimenta A, Ferreira A, Lopes A. The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:652
- Gallagher R, Kirkness A, Zelestis E, Hollams D, Kneale C, Armari E, Bennett T, Daly J, Tofler G. A randomised trial of a weight loss intervention for overweight and obese people diagnosed with coronary heart disease and/or type 2 diabetes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2012; 44:119-128
- Hollis G, Franz R, Bauer J ,Bell J. Implementation of a very low calorie diet program into the pre-operative model of care for obese general elective surgery patients: outcomes of a feasibility randomised control trial. Nutrition & Dietetics 2020; 77:490-498
- Huseinovic E, Bertz F, Brekke H, Winkvist A. Two-year follow-up of a postpartum weight loss intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Maternal & Child Nutrition 2018; 14:e12539
- Karintrakul S, Angkatavanich J. A randomized controlled trial of an individualized nutrition counseling program matched with a transtheoretical model for overweight and obese females in Thailand. Nutrition Research and Practice 2017; 11:319-326
- Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, Lavori P, Wilson S, Rosas L, Stafford R. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013; 173:113-121
- Nilsen V, Bakke P, Gallefoss F. Effects of lifestyle intervention in persons at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus - results from a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:893
- Ventura Marra M, Lilly C, Nelson K, Woofter D, Malone J. . A pilot randomized controlled trial of a telenutrition weight loss intervention in middle-aged and older men with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Nutrients 2019; 11:
- Detail
-
Search Plan and Results: AWM: Interventions from a Dietitian (2021)
-
Conclusion