Just Published!  The Evidence Analysis Library is pleased to announce the publication of the Disorders of Lipid Metabolism Saturated Fat Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline. View the guideline.

Diabetes Prevention

PDM: Prediabetes (2013)

  • Intervention
    In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on glycemic-related outcomes (such as fasting blood glucose, random blood glucose, two-hour post-prandial blood glucose, A1C)?
    • Conclusion

      There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on glycemic-related outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.

      Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of fruits and vegetables intake on glycemic outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.

    • Grade: V
      • Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
      • Grade II is Fair;
      • Grade III is Limited/Weak;
      • Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
      • Grade V is Not Assignable.
      • High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
      • Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
      • Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
      • Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
      • Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
    • Search Plan and Results: PDM: Fruits and Vegetables and Prediabetes 2012
       
    In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on lipid outcomes (TG, HDL)?
    • Conclusion

      There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on lipid outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.

      Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of fruits and vegetables intake on lipid outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.

    • Grade: V
      • Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
      • Grade II is Fair;
      • Grade III is Limited/Weak;
      • Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
      • Grade V is Not Assignable.
      • High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
      • Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
      • Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
      • Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
      • Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
    • Search Plan and Results: PDM: Fruits and Vegetables and Prediabetes 2012
       
    In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on anthropometric outcomes (WC, WHR)?
    • Conclusion

      There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on anthropometric outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.

      Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of fruits and vegetables intake on anthropometric outcomes in individuals with prediabetes.

    • Grade: V
      • Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
      • Grade II is Fair;
      • Grade III is Limited/Weak;
      • Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
      • Grade V is Not Assignable.
      • High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
      • Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
      • Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
      • Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
      • Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
    • Search Plan and Results: PDM: Fruits and Vegetables and Prediabetes 2012
       
    In individuals with prediabetes, what is the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on blood pressure?
    • Conclusion

      There were no studies identified to evaluate the impact of fruits and vegetables intake, independent of weight loss, on blood pressure in individuals with prediabetes.

      Intervention studies are needed to ascertain the effects of fruits and vegetables intake on blood pressure in individuals with prediabetes.

       

    • Grade: V
      • Grade I means there is Good/Strong evidence supporting the statement;
      • Grade II is Fair;
      • Grade III is Limited/Weak;
      • Grade IV is Expert Opinion Only;
      • Grade V is Not Assignable.
      • High (A) means we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;
      • Moderate (B) means we are moderately confident in the effect estimate;
      • Low (C) means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited;
      • Very Low (D) means we have very little confidence in the effect estimate.
      • Ungraded means a grade is not assignable.
    • Search Plan and Results: PDM: Fruits and Vegetables and Prediabetes 2012