CKD: Anemia (2001)
Article inclusion criteria not defined.
Not specified.
Recruitment: Article inclusion methods not described.
Design: Narrative Review.
Blinding used (if applicable): not applicable
Intervention (if applicable): not applicable
Statistical Analysis: statistical analysis not performed.
Timing of Measurements: not applicable
Dependent Variables: not applicable
Independent Variables: not applicable
Control Variables: not applicable
Initial N: 19 references included.
Attrition (final N): 19 references
Age: not mentioned
Ethnicity: not mentioned
Other relevant demographics: n/a
Anthropometrics: n/a
Location: Worldwide studies
Other Findings
Potential causes of inadequate response to rh-Epo
1. Major factors
a. iron deficiency
b. infection
c. non-infectious inflammatory states
d. chronic blood loss
2. Minor factors
a. hyperparathyroidism
b. inadequate dialysis
c. aluminum overload
d. folic acid or vitamin B-12 deficiency
e. vitamin C deficiency
f. malignancy
g. drug intake (ACE inhibitors?)
h. hemolysis and bone marrow disorders
Iron deficiency
1. The most common cause of inadequate response to rh-EPO therapy is iron deficiency as defined by serum ferritin <20 µg/L and functional iron deficiency when serum ferritin is normal, but insufficient iron can be made available to meet the needs of erythropoiesis and Hb fails to increase as expected with usual doses of rh-EPO.
2. Iron deficiency can also occur as a result of interference with normal iron metabolism by aluminium toxicity.
Inflammation
1. Erythropoiesis is inhibited by cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 1, and interferon- gamma; in addition the marker for inflammation, high serum levels of C-reactive protein predicts resistance to rh-EPO treatment.
a. cytokines are directly produced by macrophages and thus are a refection of the inflammatory process.
b. cytokines also disrupt iron metabolism, probably through impaired release of iron from the monocyte-macrophage system.
Quality of dialysis
1. Two studies found that rh-Epo dose requirement decreased as the urea reduction rate increased.
Hyperparathyroidism
1. There are several potential mechanisms by which hyperparathyroidism can exacerbate anemia in CRF. These include a direct toxic effect of PTH on erythropoietin synthesis as well as on RBC production and survival and an indirect effect via the induction of marrow fibrosis and interference with erythropiesis.
Before | 2 months | P | |
No rh-EPO (n=20) |
|||
PTH (pg/ml) |
948+501 |
54+42 |
n.a. |
Hb (g/dl) + rh=EPO (n=19) |
10.0+1.3 |
11.1+1.1 |
<0.01 |
PTH (pg/ml) |
1023+515 |
55+41 |
n.a. |
Hb (g/dl) |
8.6+1.0 |
10.4+1.2 |
<0.005 |
Rh-EPO dose/wk |
170+67 |
112+48 |
<0.005 |
Other factors affecting rh-EPO responsiveness
1. Aluminum overload can interfere with iron metabolism and with the enzymes of heme synthesis resulting in microcytic anemia.
2. Vitamin deficiencies such as folic acid or B-12 can aggravate anemia of CRF and contribute to resistance to rh-EPO treatment.
3. There is some evidence that vitamin C deficiency is associated with decreased availability of stored iron, and systematic administration of vitamin C supplements can improve iron availability, although large exogenous doses of vitamin C may increase the risk of oxalate deposition.
4. Blood loss is a common factor in rh-Epo hyporesponsiveness.
5. Patients with various forms of solid tissue malignancy may show chronic anemia that is resistant to rh-Epo.
Iron deficiency is considered the most important factor influencing rh-Epo response. It is widely accepted that maintaining adequate iron levels reduces dosage requirement and improves efficacy in HD patients.
Many other factors can influence resistance to rh-Epo therapy, especially inflammation and infection, quality of dialysis and hyperparathyroidism.
Optimizing response to rh-Epo therapy is important for both patient outcoes and the cost of treatment, and requires consideration of a growing number of factors, some well established and others more controversial.
University/Hospital: | Necker Hospital (Paris France) |
This paper is a good review of factors that can interfere with rh-EPO therapy, including nutritional deficiencies of folate, vitamin B-12 and vitamin C as well as iron.
Only 19 references listed.
Quality Criteria Checklist: Review Articles
|
|||
Relevance Questions | |||
1. | Will the answer if true, have a direct bearing on the health of patients? | Yes | |
2. | Is the outcome or topic something that patients/clients/population groups would care about? | Yes | |
3. | Is the problem addressed in the review one that is relevant to dietetics practice? | Yes | |
4. | Will the information, if true, require a change in practice? | Yes | |
Validity Questions | |||
1. | Was the question for the review clearly focused and appropriate? | Yes | |
2. | Was the search strategy used to locate relevant studies comprehensive? Were the databases searched and the search termsused described? | No | |
3. | Were explicit methods used to select studies to include in the review? Were inclusion/exclusion criteria specified andappropriate? Wereselectionmethods unbiased? | No | |
4. | Was there an appraisal of the quality and validity of studies included in the review? Were appraisal methodsspecified,appropriate, andreproducible? | No | |
5. | Were specific treatments/interventions/exposures described? Were treatments similar enough to be combined? | Yes | |
6. | Was the outcome of interest clearly indicated? Were other potential harms and benefits considered? | Yes | |
7. | Were processes for data abstraction, synthesis, and analysis described? Were they applied consistently acrossstudies and groups? Was thereappropriate use of qualitative and/or quantitative synthesis? Was variation in findings among studies analyzed? Were heterogeneity issued considered? If data from studies were aggregated for meta-analysis, was the procedure described? | No | |
8. | Are the results clearly presented in narrative and/or quantitative terms? If summary statistics are used, are levels ofsignificance and/or confidence intervals included? | Yes | |
9. | Are conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? Are limitations ofthe review identified anddiscussed? | No | |
10. | Was bias due to the review's funding or sponsorship unlikely? | Yes | |