EE: Steady State (2005)
fTo address metabolic measurement during mechanical ventilation
Population studied
Mechanically ventilated patients in the hospital or extended care facility settings.
There were four members on the Mechanical Ventilation Guidelines Committee. All members were Registered Respiratory Therapists (RRT) and one has attained a PhD.
Outcome(s) and other measures
IC Outcomes reported:
-
(9.2) Interpretation and confirmation/manipulation of patient nutritional support regimen by physician or nutritionist based on measurement results
-
(9.3) Successful manipulation of the mechanical ventilator settings and/or hemodynamic management based on the measurement of the VO2
Articles were summarized in the following categories: patient characteristics of whom would benefit from IC, contraindications, hazards/complications, procedural accuracy, types of IC, monitoring (and frequency) and infection control. Literature citations were listed where relevant. No analytic methods were used.
56 articles were cited
(Note: Elia citation listed as reference #2 and #34)
There were 31 primary research articles, 11 reviews, 2 textbook references, and 2 abstract proceeding citations. There were 8 in-vitro validation studies and one Centers for Disease Control guidelines describing Universal Precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and other bloodborne pathogens.
- Sample sizes ranged from n=2 “young” patients (Dark DS Pingleton SK, Kerby GR. Hypercapnia during weaning: a complication of nutritional support. Chest. 1985;88:141-143) to the largest sample size of 100
- (Foster GD, Knox LS, Dempsey DT, Mullen JL. Caloric requirements in total parenteral nutrition. J Am Coll Nutr. 1987;6:231-253). Using abstracts, there were 5 studies where the sample size wasn’t available.
6 articles were published before 1980; 16 were published 1980-1985, 32 published between the years 1986-1990; and 1 was published between 1991-1994.
Diseases studied included neurologic trauma (8 citations), paralysis (citation), COPD (4 citations), acute pancreatitis (1 citation), cancer with residual tumor burden (1 citation), multiple trauma (3 citations), amputations (1 citation), patients in whom height and weight cannot be accurately obtained (1 citation), and patients who fail to respond adequately to estimated nutritional needs (1 citation); new patients on home TPN (1 citation); patients who are unable to eat and who require mechanical ventilation for >5 days (1 citations), transplant patients (1 citation), and severely hypermetalolic or hypometabolic patients (no citation).Calculation of RQ and REE
[VO2 (3.941)+VCO2 (1.11)] 1440 min/day
No quantitative analysis or effect sizes reported
QUALITATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS
Risk of patient harm
6.1&2: Closed circuit calorimeters may reduce alveolar ventilation due to increased compressible volume of breathing cirucuit (4 citations representing 1 review, 2 equipment validation and 1 primary research article with n=21 patients), trigger sensitivity of the ventilator and result in increased patient breathing work (same 4 citations).
6.3: Short-term disconnect may result in hypoxemia, bradycardia, and pt discomfort (2 citations)
6.4: Inappropriate calibration or system setup results in incorrect patient management (3 citations where 2 are review articles and 1 is a book chapter)
Procedural Limitations
Inaccurate due to
7.1: Patient condition or bedside procedures/activities (3 references w/two by same researcher)
7.2: Gas leaks from the patient, ventilator circuit, tracheal tube cuffs or uncuffed tubes, chest tubes or bronchopleural fistula (2 review articles and one primary research article with 9 subjects)
7.3: Peritoneal and hemodialysis (2 review articles, 1 textbook article and one primary study n=15)
7.4: REE and RQ related to pen circuit measurement error caused by
- .1) Unstable oxygen concentration delivered w/breath or breath to breath d/t changes in gas pressure and ventilator blender/mixing characteristics (1 primary research article, 1 equipment validation study)
- .2) Flow of delivered O2>0.60 (same as 0.1)
- .3) Inability to separate inspired and expired gases due to ventilation system (2 studies)
- .4) Presence of anesthetic gases
- .5) Water vapor
- .6) Inappropriate calibration (1 article published 1979)
- .7) Connect to IC to certain ventilators interferes with triggering mechanism, pressure measurement or ventilator maintenance (Review article)
- .8) Total circuit flow exceeds IC internal gas flow with dilutional principle (peds study)
7.5: Close circuit measurements caused by:
- .1) Short measurement period not allowing for CO2absorber life and VCO2
- .2) Functional residual capacity resulting in spirometer volume changes not associated with VO2 (1 review, 2 validation studies, 1 primary research article)
- .3) Gas leaks during spontaneious breathing measurements that add to system volume and cause erroneously low VO2readings (same as 0.2)
- .4) Increased compressible volume that prevents adequate tidal volume resulting in alveolar hypoventilation changes in VCO2VO2 (same citations as 0.2)
- .5) Increased compressible volume and resistance results in difficulty triggering the ventilator and increased the work of breathing (same citations as 0.2)
9.0: Test Quality Assessments
- .1) Compare to nutrition intake (1 textbook, 4 reviews)
- .2) Normal physiologic range 0.67-1.3 (same as 0.1)
- .3) Measured VO2±10% mean value and measured VCO2±6% mean value (1 review)
- .4) Environment during measurement w/patient lying in bed, aware of his/her surroundings (1 primary research article; n=17 patients)
10.0: Calibration Procedures
10.1: Open or closed-circuit IC:
- .1) Gas mixture = Gas concentration measured clinically (same as 9.1 references)
- .2) Calibrate on measurement day
- .3) If IC measurements suspect or instable repeated measurement, an in-vitro test or measuring healthy volunteer is appropriate
10.2: Open-circuit methods need to stabilize flow delivered O210.3 Isolation valve, double-piloted exhalation valve or other device that separates inspiratory aand expiratory flow should be used when continuous flow in the ventilator circuit is used (1 citation)
10.4: Personnel training needs to include documented ability to:
- .1) Calibrate, operate, and maintain an indirect calorimeter
- .2) Operate mechanical ventilator, including air-oxygen blending system, spontaneous breathing mechanisms, and alarm/monitoring functions
- .3) Recognize metabolic measurement values withing the normal physiologic range and evaluate the results in light of the patient’s current nutritional/clinical status
- .4) Assess patient hemodynamic and ventilatory status and make recommendations on appropriate corrective/therapeutic maneuvers to improve or reverse pt’s clinical course
RRT, CRTT, RN, or RPFT is desirable
(No references for personnel training)
11.0: Monitoring
11.1: Monitoring during test:
- .1)Clinical observation of resting state
- .2)Values correspond to clinical situation
- .4)Equipment function
- .5)Measured VO2±10% of the mean value and measured VCO2±6% of the mean value
12.0: Monitoring frequency
1.0-1.2 (and 12.2) Rapidly changing clinical course due to hemodynamic instability, spiking fevers, immediate postoperative period or those being weaned from mechanical ventilation (1 primary research article, n=17)
13.0: Infection Control Guidelines (CDC Universal precautions):
13.1: Equipment is contaminated with blood or other body fluids
13.2: Appropriate use of barriers and handwashing
13.3: Tube used in direct expiratory gas from the ventilator to the IC should be disposed or cleaned between patients
13.4: Inspiratory limb connections of the circuit proximal to the humidifier should be subjected to high-level disinfection b/t pt
13.5: Bacteria filters may be used to protect equipment in inspired and expired lines, but caution is used to prevent moisture from increasing filter resistance resulting in poor gas sampling flow or increased resistance to exhalation.
Quality Criteria Checklist: Review Articles
|
|||
Relevance Questions | |||
1. | Will the answer if true, have a direct bearing on the health of patients? | Yes | |
2. | Is the outcome or topic something that patients/clients/population groups would care about? | Yes | |
3. | Is the problem addressed in the review one that is relevant to dietetics practice? | Yes | |
4. | Will the information, if true, require a change in practice? | Yes | |
Validity Questions | |||
1. | Was the question for the review clearly focused and appropriate? | Yes | |
2. | Was the search strategy used to locate relevant studies comprehensive? Were the databases searched and the search termsused described? | No | |
3. | Were explicit methods used to select studies to include in the review? Were inclusion/exclusion criteria specified andappropriate? Wereselectionmethods unbiased? | No | |
4. | Was there an appraisal of the quality and validity of studies included in the review? Were appraisal methodsspecified,appropriate, andreproducible? | No | |
5. | Were specific treatments/interventions/exposures described? Were treatments similar enough to be combined? | Yes | |
6. | Was the outcome of interest clearly indicated? Were other potential harms and benefits considered? | Yes | |
7. | Were processes for data abstraction, synthesis, and analysis described? Were they applied consistently acrossstudies and groups? Was thereappropriate use of qualitative and/or quantitative synthesis? Was variation in findings among studies analyzed? Were heterogeneity issued considered? If data from studies were aggregated for meta-analysis, was the procedure described? | No | |
8. | Are the results clearly presented in narrative and/or quantitative terms? If summary statistics are used, are levels ofsignificance and/or confidence intervals included? | Yes | |
9. | Are conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? Are limitations ofthe review identified anddiscussed? | No | |
10. | Was bias due to the review's funding or sponsorship unlikely? | Yes | |